In the article “SUSY: A Matter Of Prior Beliefs, http://www.science20.com/quantum_diaries_survivor/susy_matter_prior_beliefs-89994
“, it wrote, “In this sorry age for Supersymmetry (SUSY) phenomenologists, it
is quite easy to step on an aching toe while discussing the results of the
Large Hadron Collider experiments, whose results have let these physicists down
by excluding the presence of SUSY where most of them used to put their moneys
until yesterday.
… in the most stubborn SUSY enthusiasts is to seek refuge in
a concept which could be summarized as follows: 'There is only one true
realization of SUSY in Nature, and one point of the parameter space which
corresponds to it; the fact that the LHC has kept excluding parameter space
points that do not correspond to the true realization of SUSY says nothing on
the correctness of SUSY anyway'.
… Keeping oneself anchored to a point-mass PDF that
"SUSY is correct" equates to dismissing as garbage all the negative
results of the LHC searches. I will say more: it equates to saying that it is
useless to do experimental research, because SUSY might be hiding where we have
no access with particle collisions or other experiments. Given that, and given
that we must already be sure that SUSY is correct, why searching for it? …
I am confident, though, that the attitude of those SUSY
enthusiasts who choose the point-mass PDF is going to change if we continue
excluding parameter space points at the LHC.
... so even the stubborn among them will soon choose some
other point mass to anchor themselves and their careers to.”
The above passage is truly important for today’s physics
research. However, I myself am less concerning about those stubborn minds but
more about the meaning of those LHC results. If the SUSY with sparticles is as
“one” rabbit which has 100 hideouts, then the exclusion of 70 holes will have
no power to make a conclusion about the remaining 30 hideouts. However, if the
100 parameter points of those SUSY theories are 100 rabbits, then the discovery
of 70 stillbirth rabbits can definitely lead to a conclusion that the fates of
those remaining 30 rabbits are not very promising. Thus, there is not much
chance at all for any SUSY to survive after the MSSM and cMSSM are ruled out by
the LHC data already.
Yet, my concern goes beyond the death sentence for the SUSY (with
sparticles). If all the babies are dead with stillbirths, what is the health of
the mother? Why are those babies born dead? What is the death-gene for those
SUSY babies?
The conception of all SUSY babies was from the Higgs
mechanism. Then, this Higgs mechanism must also be the death gene for them. In
addition to those stillbirth SUSYs, there is a very important reason to cut the
Higgs mechanism out. That is, there is a correct mechanism to replace the Higgs
mechanism, and it is described in the article “The Rise of Gravity and Electric
Charge, http://www.prequark.org/Gravity.htm
“.
No comments:
Post a Comment