In the article “Questioning the Foundations: 4th FQXi Essay
Contest, http://blog.vixra.org/2012/05/25/questioning-the-foundations-4th-fqxi-essay-contest/
“, it reports that “The Foundational Questions Institute [FQI] has announced
its 4th Essay contest on the question ‘Which of Our Basic Physical Assumptions
Are Wrong?’ Scientific American is co-sponsors again along with Gruber and
submeta.”
I am not a contest goer but do think that this question of
FQI is an important issue.
The reason that LHC is still struggling for some answers is
that the mainstream physics community does not know the correct foundational
physics principle yet, as otherwise the entire framework of the physical
universe would be known. In fact, even if the SM Higgs were discovered, it will still not help one bit for the final understanding on physics. There are two possibilities for this ignorance.
1. This correct
physics principle is simply not discovered yet.
2. This correct
physics principle is rejected by the mainstream physics community because of the
deep rooted beliefs of a set the wrong principles.
Here, I must say that
the second possibility is the case.
The concept of 4-dimension space-time continuum was a very
useful base for the Relativities. Yet, the correct physics principle should be
as,
a. The time is a quantum,
while continuum is a very good approximation.
b. In addition to the real time (+/- t), there
are imaginary time (+/- t, +/- it). That is, time has four dimensions. This is
the true supersymmetry, not the s-particle type.
c. Instead of
being completely different between space and time, the space is only a trait of
time.
The above three constitute the correct physics principle
which gives rise to the Axiomatic Physics, and it is described in the article “Axiomatic
physics, the revolutionary physics epistemology, http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2012/05/axiomatic-physics-revolutionary-physics.html
“.
No comments:
Post a Comment