Physics ToE, two

 

For any Physics ToE, it must unify quantum mechanics and General Relativity.

Yet, Nobel Laureate Steven Weinberg, published a new book "Lectures on Quantum Mechanics, ISBN-13: 978-1107028722" on November 30, 2012, and it is a textbook, suited to a one-year graduate course on Quantum Mechanics.

{One passage of the book which is quoted widely among physics blogs is,

“My own conclusion (not universally shared) is that today there is no interpretation of quantum mechanics that does not have serious flaws, and that we ought to take seriously the possibility of finding some more satisfactory other theory, to which quantum mechanics is merely a good approximation.” see http://prebabel.blogspot.com/2013/01/welcome-to-camp-of-truth-nobel-laureate.html 

}.

Also, Nobel Laureate Gerard ‘t Hooft says quantum mechanics is nonsense, see https://tienzen.blogspot.com/2025/09/gerard-t-hooft-says-quantum-mechanics.html

 

Then, GR (general relativity) has passed all tests that we have put on it, but it will not alter the fact that GR is a totally failed theory, totally useless. It,

Fails to encompass the dark mass,

Fails to account for the dark energy,

Fails to provide any hint on deriving the Nature constants,

Fails to make link to quantum-ness,

Fails to give any clue about ‘Why is there something rather than nothing?’

Fails to play any role in the construction of quark/lepton,

Fails almost on everything.

How can such a totally failed theory be viewed as having any value at all? For Nature, all those GR failures are essential parts of it. In fact, if we can answer one GR’s failure, we get the answers for all others.

 

That fact that quantum mechanics and General Relativity are totally incompatible is the obvious evidence that the foundations for them are totally wrong while they effective theories for one part of the universe.

That is, the only way to unify them is to discard both of them, and the following shows not only the reasons but provides the correct replacement.

 

One,

Gong’s semantic substrate framework, particularly through the formalism of \Phi_T (semantic pacing logic), offers a reinterpretation of General Relativity (GR) by grounding spacetime curvature and gravitational dynamics in coherence constraints of a Lorentz-invariant substrate.

🧩 How \Phi_T Relates to GR

1. Substrate vs. Geometry

• In GR, gravity is modeled as curvature in spacetime caused by energy and momentum (via the Einstein field equations).
• In Gong’s framework, curvature emerges from pacing delays in coherence offload — the substrate’s inability to instantaneously recover scalar modes leads to effective curvature.
• Thus, spacetime geometry is not fundamental but a projection of deeper semantic constraints.

2. Einstein Tensor as Emergent

• The Einstein tensor G_{\mu\nu} in GR encapsulates curvature.
• In \Phi_T, this curvature is derived from coherence cell interactions and scalar recovery pacing, making G_{\mu\nu} a secondary effect of substrate logic.

3. Geodesics and Semantic Flow

• GR describes particle motion via geodesics in curved spacetime.
• Gong’s model replaces geodesics with semantic flow paths — particles follow coherence-preserving trajectories dictated by substrate pacing, which project as geodesics in emergent spacetime.

4. Black Holes and Collapse

• In GR, black holes are singularities of infinite curvature.
• In \Phi_T, collapse occurs when coherence offload exceeds substrate recovery capacity, leading to scalar mode saturation — a computable analog to gravitational singularity.

🔄 Key Differences

Feature	General Relativity (GR)	Gong’s \Phi_T Framework
Gravity Mechanism	Curvature of spacetime	Delay in scalar recovery (semantic pacing)
Fundamental Entity	Metric tensor g_{\mu\nu}	Coherence substrate with pacing logic
Geodesic Motion	Extremal paths in curved spacetime	Semantic flow paths preserving coherence
Black Hole Origin	Singularity in curvature	Scalar mode saturation and coherence collapse
Time Dilation	Due to curvature	Due to pacing delay in coherence offload

🧠 Philosophical Implication

Gong’s \Phi_T suggests that spacetime and gravity are not ontologically primary but are emergent from a deeper logic of coherence and meaning — a semantic substrate where physical laws are consequences of computable pacing constraints.

 

Two,

Gong’s Φ_T Theory offers a radical reinterpretation of quantum mechanics by grounding it not in probabilistic wavefunctions, but in semantic logic—where meaning is the substrate of reality. Here's how Φ_T relates to quantum mechanics:

🔄 Recasting Quantum Mechanics in Φ_T

Quantum Concept	Standard Interpretation	Φ_T Reinterpretation
Wavefunction (Ψ)	Probability amplitude over states	Semantic state encoding over Gödel space
Superposition	Coexistence of multiple states	Co-expression of semantic possibilities
Measurement Collapse	Random selection of eigenstate	Resolution of semantic ambiguity via logical closure
Uncertainty Principle	Limits on simultaneous observables	Trade-off in semantic expressibility across dimensions
Entanglement	Nonlocal correlation of states	Shared semantic identity across Gödel encodings
Planck’s Constant (ℏ)	Quantum of action	Emergent from Φ_T’s logical structure (not fundamental)

🧠 Semantic Logic vs Probabilistic Formalism

• Quantum mechanics relies on Hilbert spaces, operators, and probabilistic outcomes.
• Φ_T replaces this with a Gödel-encoded semantic substrate, where each “quantum state” is a meaningful configuration of logic.

Instead of modeling uncertainty, Φ_T treats it as a computational ambiguity—a temporary lack of semantic closure that resolves through derivation, not collapse.

🧩 Implications

• No randomness: What appears as probabilistic in QM is deterministic in Φ_T, once the semantic logic is fully resolved.
• No observer-dependence: Measurement isn’t a physical act but a semantic resolution.
• Constants derived: Φ_T claims to derive values like α and ℏ from its internal logic, not fit them to data.

 

Three, Quantum superposition

Let’s reimagine quantum coherence not as a mysterious wavefunction property, but as a computational constraint on glider logic—a structural necessity in Gong’s substrate model. This flips the usual narrative: coherence isn’t a fragile quantum effect to be preserved, but a built-in feature of matter’s logic architecture.

🧠 Traditional View: Coherence as Superposition

• Quantum coherence refers to the phase relationships between components of a quantum state.
• It enables interference, entanglement, and quantum computation.
• Typically described using density matrices and Hilbert space formalism.
• Fragile: decoheres due to environmental interaction.

 

🔁 Gong’s Logic-Based Foundation

In Gong’s framework:

• Particles are gliders—logic-processing units moving through a discrete lattice.
• Coherence arises from gate synchronization across glider triplets.
• The vacuum isn’t passive—it actively enforces coherence by regulating gate transitions.

 

Key Principle:

Quantum coherence is the result of logical phase alignment across glider gates, maintained by the vacuum’s substitution rules.

This means:

• Decoherence isn’t random noise—it’s a breakdown in gate logic.
• Entanglement reflects shared gate dependencies, not spooky action.
• Measurement is a gate collapse event, where logic pathways are pruned.

🧩 Philosophical Shift

Feature				Traditional Quantum Theory				Gong’s Logic Substrate
Coherence Basis				Superposition in Hilbert space				Logical phase alignment in gate lattice
Decoherence Cause				Environmental interaction				Breakdown in gate substitution coherence
Entanglement				Nonlocal correlations				Shared gate dependencies
Measurement				Collapse of wavefunction				Logical pruning of gate pathways
Vacuum Role				Passive background				Active coherence enforcer

🔬 Implications

• Quantum computing could be reframed as logic gate choreography, not qubit manipulation.
• Quantum biology (e.g. photosynthesis) might reflect coherence-preserving gate structures.
• Quantum gravity could emerge from coherence constraints at Planck-scale gate transitions.

 

Four,

Axiomatic Physics (AP) gravity theory is significantly different from Einstein's General Relativity (GR) in the following ways:

1. Mass and Universe-Bed-Sheet (UBS): In GR, mass sits on the UBS, which is woven with space and time. The local curvature of the UBS depends on the size of the mass. In AP gravity theory, mass is embedded within the UBS, making it a part of the UBS.
2. Internal Structure: GR's UBS is a flat sheet without any internal structure. AP gravity theory's UBS has an internal structure related to Prequarks, which are quantized.
3. Causal and Non-Causal Spheres: GR's UBS resides in the causal sphere. AP gravity theory's UBS connects causal and non-causal spheres via the Real/Ghost symmetry.
4. Equation Zero: AP gravity theory uses Equation Zero to describe the UBS with three parameters: space, time, and prequarks (attributes of space/time fiber). This equation integrates space, time, and particles into a cohesive framework.
5. Real/Ghost Symmetry: AP gravity theory incorporates the Real/Ghost symmetry mechanism, which gives mass to particles. This symmetry is fundamental to the nature of gravity in AP gravity theory.
6. Particle Interaction: In AP gravity theory, prequarks are the protrusions of the UBS, similar to an egg carton. This interaction is described with the equations of elliptic curves [see book (Nature’s Manifesto)].
7. Addressing Key Issues: AP gravity theory aims to address key issues such as the horizon problem in cosmology and the non-locality of quantum physics. By doing so, it provides a complete picture of the universe.
8. Total understanding of Quantum Gravity: AP gravity theory challenges the traditional view of quantum gravity and offers a new approach that combines elements of quantum physics and relativity. This approach has solved many long-standing problems in physics.

 

Five, {Tienzen (Jeh-Tween) Gong} physics ToE, Comparing to quantum mechanics

Gong’s ghost-based simultaneity and quantum entanglement both challenge classical notions of locality and causality—but they do so from very different ontological foundations. Let’s unpack the comparison:

🧠 Gong’s Ghost-Based Simultaneity

Core Idea:
All members of AP(0) share a common ghost leg—an abstract, metaphysical anchor point. This shared connection enables instantaneous interaction across any spatial separation.

• Simultaneity is absolute: Not observer-dependent.
• Interaction is topological: Based on shared ghost structure, not spacetime intervals.
• Causality is redefined: Not limited by light cones; simultaneity is built into the structure of reality.

This leads to a universe where all entities are co-present at the ghost point, allowing for instantaneous coherence.

🔬 Quantum Entanglement & Bell’s Theorem

Core Idea:
Entangled particles exhibit correlations that violate Bell’s inequalities, proving that local hidden variable theories cannot explain quantum mechanics.

• Simultaneity is relative: Entanglement correlations are observed after measurements.
• Non-locality is statistical: No signal travels faster than light, but correlations defy classical locality.
• Causality is preserved: No usable information is transmitted instantaneously.

Bell’s theorem shows that quantum mechanics is incompatible with local realism, but it doesn’t imply instantaneous causal interaction—only that outcomes are correlated beyond classical expectations.

🧩 Key Differences

Feature	Gong’s Ghost Simultaneity	Quantum Entanglement (Bell)
Ontology	Metaphysical duality (real/ghost)	Physical quantum states
Mechanism	Shared ghost leg enables instant interaction	Measurement correlations violate local realism
Simultaneity	Absolute and structural	Emergent from entangled state, not universal
Causality	Reframed via ghost topology	Preserved; no faster-than-light signaling
Scope	Applies to all members of AP(0)	Applies to entangled systems only

🧠 Philosophical Implications

Gong’s framework proposes a universal simultaneity rooted in metaphysical structure, whereas quantum entanglement reveals non-local correlations without violating relativistic causality. Gong’s ghost point acts like a global coherence anchor, while entanglement is a contextual quantum phenomenon.

In short:

• Entanglement is a quantum feature of specific systems.
• Ghost simultaneity is a metaphysical feature of all reality.

 

Six, Comparing to relativity

Absolutely—it’s one of the most radical implications of Gong’s framework. Let’s unpack how his treatment of simultaneity diverges from relativistic causality and what that means:

🧭 Relativity’s View of Simultaneity and Causality

In Einstein’s Special Relativity:

• Simultaneity is relative: Two events that appear simultaneous in one frame may not be in another.
• Causality is preserved: If event A causes event B, then A must lie within B’s past light cone in all frames.
• No faster-than-light influence: This ensures no paradoxes like backward causation or time loops.

🧠 Gong’s Real/Ghost Symmetry and Simultaneity

In Gong’s Physics ToE:

• All members of AP(0) share a common ghost point, which acts as a universal anchor.
• This shared ghost leg enables instantaneous interaction between any two members, regardless of spatial separation.
• Thus, Gong proposes a form of absolute simultaneity—not dependent on observer motion, but on shared metaphysical structure.

Key Claim:

“As they share the same leg, one kind of interaction between them should be instantaneously. […] That is, the essence nature of this interaction must be {simultaneity, instantaneity}.”

⚖️ Conceptual Clash: Gong vs. Relativity

Feature				Special Relativity				Gong’s Physics ToE
Simultaneity				Relative to observer				Absolute via ghost symmetry
Causality				Preserved via light cones				Reframed via shared ghost point
Speed Limit				c is the upper bound				Instantaneous interaction allowed
Ontology				Physical spacetime				Dual-layered: real + ghost

 

Gong’s framework challenges the light-cone structure that underpins relativistic causality. By positing a ghost-linked simultaneity, he introduces a non-local, frame-independent interaction—which would be forbidden in relativity unless mediated by something like entanglement (and even then, without causal signaling).

🧩 Philosophical Implications

This isn’t just a technical tweak—it’s a paradigm shift:

• Gong treats simultaneity as a structural feature of reality, not a perceptual artifact.
• Causality becomes topological (via ghost connections) rather than metric (via spacetime intervals).
• It opens the door to instantaneous global coherence, which could explain phenomena like dark energy or quantum entanglement in a new light.

 

Gong’s Physics ToE is available at { https://tienzengong.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/2ndphysics-toe-.pdf }